# MODIFIABLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TEMPLATE
## Project Title: OCI vs. AWS vs. Azure vs. GCP Cost Comparison: Compute, Spot VMs, Block IOPS & BYOL
- **RFP Document Reference**: `VNA-RFP-018` (Companion to Solution Brief `VNA-SB-018`)
- **Issuing Organization**: `[INSERT ORGANIZATION / COMPANY NAME]`
- **Issue Date**: `[2026-10-27]`
- **Proposal Due Date**: `[INSERT DATE, e.g., +30 Calendar Days]`
- **Reference Architecture Portal**: https://oci-vs-aws-azure-gcp-cost.web.app/
- **Template Attribution**: This site is designed by Viscosity.AI

---

## SECTION 1: ISSUING ORGANIZATION PROFILE & PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE (MODIFIABLE)

> **Instructions for RFP Author**: Replace all bracketed placeholders (`[...]`) below with your organization's specific dates, contacts, and environment metrics before issuing to prospective bidders.

| Procurement Milestone | Target Date / Entry (Modifiable) |
|---|---|
| Issuing Organization Name | `[Insert Legal Entity Name]` |
| Primary Procurement / Technical Contact | `[Insert Name, Title, Email]` |
| RFP Issue Date | `[2026-10-27]` |
| Vendor Written Questions Due | `[Insert Date - Week 2]` |
| Organization Responses to Vendor Q&A | `[Insert Date - Week 3]` |
| Final Vendor Proposals & Pricing Due | `[Insert Date - Week 4]` |
| Technical Architecture Demos / Oral Presentations | `[Insert Date - Week 5]` |
| Target Contract Award & Phase 0 Kickoff | `[Insert Date - Week 6]` |

### 1.1 Executive Summary & Business Objectives
`[INSERT COMPANY NAME]` ("Organization") is soliciting competitive proposals from qualified enterprise architecture and engineering firms to modernize and transition our current **AWS (EC2, EBS, RDS), Microsoft Azure (VMs, SQL), Google Cloud (GCE, Cloud SQL)** environment to **Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI Flexible Compute, Preemptible/Spot VMs, NVMe Block, Autonomous DB)**.

Our primary business and technical objectives are:
- AWS, Azure, and GCP lock customers into rigid t-shirt VM sizes (forcing you to double RAM just to add CPU cores or vice versa) and charge extra for regions outside US-East.
- Provisioning high-performance database storage (e.g., 30,000+ IOPS and 1,000 MB/s throughput) on AWS `io2`/`gp3` or Azure Ultra Disk often costs more per month than the compute instances themselves.
- Outbound internet data egress on AWS, Azure, and GCP starts at $85 to $120 per TB after just 100 GB, punishing data-intensive APIs, SaaS platforms, and multi-cloud architectures.

---

## SECTION 2: CURRENT ENVIRONMENT BASELINE INVENTORY (MODIFIABLE)

Bidders must size their technical delivery plan and fixed-fee milestone pricing against the baseline inventory table below:

| Inventory Dimension | Current Baseline Count / Footprint (Modifiable) | Target Modernization SLA / Objective |
|---|---|---|
| Legacy Source Stack (`Stack X`) | AWS (EC2, EBS, RDS), Microsoft Azure (VMs, SQL), Google Cloud (GCE, Cloud SQL) | Full retirement / modernization |
| Target Architecture (`Stack Y`) | Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI Flexible Compute, Preemptible/Spot VMs, NVMe Block, Autonomous DB) | Production-grade HA/DR & security |
| Current Monthly AWS / Azure / GCP Spend ($) | `[Insert Count, e.g., 65000 $/mo]` | 100% functional parity & optimization |
| Monthly Outbound Data Egress & Storage (TB) | `[Insert Count, e.g., 45 TB/mo]` | Automated AST & schema uplift |
| Target Cutover Downtime Window | `[e.g., < 15 Minutes / Near-Zero Downtime]` | Rehearsed parallel run + rollback plan |
| Security, Compliance & Identity | `[e.g., SSO/MFA via Entra ID / Okta, Row-Level VPD, Audit Logs]` | Zero critical/high CVEs at Go-Live |

---

## SECTION 3: MANDATORY TECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK & DELIVERABLES (MODIFIABLE)

The selected partner shall execute the project across four gated phases (**Phase 0: AST Discovery & Architecture Blueprint**, **Phase 1: Core Foundation & Data/Code Conversion**, **Phase 2: Integration, Runtime Filtering & UAT**, and **Phase 3: Parallel Run, Cutover & Hypercare**).

### 3.1 Core Architectural Requirements
1. **[MODIFIABLE REQUIREMENT 1]**: Low-Level Infrastructure Benchmarks (Compute, Spot/Preemptible VMs, Block IOPS, Egress): OCI flexible AMD EPYC (`E5.Flex`) and Ampere ARM (`A1.Flex`/`A2.Flex`) shapes allow independent 1-OCPU and 1-GB RAM scaling at uniform global pricing, with flat 50% discounts on Preemptible (Spot) capacity.
2. **[MODIFIABLE REQUIREMENT 2]**: Storage & Network Economics: Every OCI Block Volume includes high baseline IOPS and dynamically scales up to 300,000 IOPS per volume using Performance Units (`VPU`) at a fraction of AWS `io2` pricing, while the first 10 TB/month of outbound internet egress is $0.00.
3. **[MODIFIABLE REQUIREMENT 3]**: Managed Platform Layer (Kubernetes, Exadata/Autonomous DB, Oracle BYOL Advantage): OCI Container Engine for Kubernetes (OKE) has a $0 control plane fee. For Oracle Database workloads, OCI's 1 OCPU = 2 vCPUs architectural mapping combined with Bring Your Own License (BYOL) and Support Rewards ($0.25-$0.33 per $1 spent) cuts net database run-rates by 50% to 70%.
4. **[MODIFIABLE REQUIREMENT 4]**: Multi-Cloud Split-Stack Execution: Using the sub-2ms OCI-Azure Interconnect and OCI-Google Cloud Interconnect (with $0 cross-cloud interconnect egress fees), you can keep front-end apps in Azure/GCP while running data-intensive compute and databases on OCI.

### 3.2 Component-Level Conversion & Deliverable Matrix
Bidders must confirm compliance with each component conversion requirement below:

| Req ID | Legacy Artifact / Baseline Workload | Required Target Architecture | Engineering Method & Acceptance Criteria | Priority (Modifiable) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REQ-01 | 8 vCPU / 32 GB RAM Linux On-Demand VM (730 hrs/mo) | OCI E5.Flex (~$128/mo) vs AWS m7a.2xlarge (~$338/mo) vs Azure D8as_v5 (~$280/mo) vs GCP n2d-standard-8 (~$252/mo) | 54-62% Compute Savings + Exact Core/RAM Sizing | `[Mandatory / Optional]` |
| REQ-02 | 8 vCPU / 32 GB RAM Spot / Preemptible Batch Worker | OCI Preemptible (~$64/mo Fixed) vs AWS Spot (~$105-$140/mo Variable) vs Azure Spot (~$85/mo) vs GCP Spot (~$76/mo) | Predictable 50% Flat Preemptible Rate (Zero Price Spikes) | `[Mandatory / Optional]` |
| REQ-03 | 1 TB Block Storage @ 32,000 IOPS & 480 MB/s | OCI Balanced/Higher Perf (~$59/mo) vs AWS gp3/io2 (~$265-$1,600/mo) vs Azure Premium SSD v2 (~$230/mo) vs GCP Extreme PD (~$325/mo) | 75-95% Lower High-IOPS Storage Cost | `[Mandatory / Optional]` |
| REQ-04 | 10 TB / Month Outbound Internet Data Egress | OCI ($0.00 Free Tier) vs AWS (~$900/mo) vs Azure (~$870/mo) vs GCP (~$850/mo) | 10 TB/mo Included Free + $0.0085/GB Thereafter | `[Mandatory / Optional]` |
| REQ-05 | 16 vCPU Enterprise Database (HA Multi-AZ) | OCI Base DB / Autonomous BYOL vs AWS RDS Oracle/Postgres vs Azure SQL Business Critical vs GCP AlloyDB | 2x Core Licensing Efficiency + OCI Support Rewards | `[Mandatory / Optional]` |

### 3.3 Mandatory Platform & Tooling Standards
- OCI Flexible Compute (`VM.Standard.E5.Flex`, `BM.DenseIO.E5.128`, `VM.Standard.A1.Flex` Ampere ARM)
- OCI Preemptible Instances (Spot VMs) & OCI Container Engine for Kubernetes (OKE)
- OCI Block Volume Dynamic Performance Scaling (VPUs) & OCI Lustre / File Storage
- Oracle Support Rewards (reduces on-premises Oracle tech license support bills by $0.25-$0.33 per $1 of OCI universal credits)
- OCI-Azure Interconnect & Oracle Database@Azure / Oracle Database@Google Cloud

---

## SECTION 4: VENDOR TECHNICAL Q&A QUESTIONNAIRE & SCORING RUBRIC

Bidders must provide direct, concise written responses to each question below. The Issuing Organization's evaluation committee will grade responses using the embedded benchmark criteria.

### Vendor Question 1: How do OCI Preemptible Instances compare to AWS EC2 Spot Instances and GCP Spot VMs?
- **Bidder Response Requirement**: Provide a concrete architectural explanation, reference toolset, and verifiable production proof. Generic marketing statements will be scored zero.
- **Evaluation Benchmark (What High-Scoring Responses Must Demonstrate)**: Unlike AWS Spot where market bidding prices can spike unexpectedly toward On-Demand rates during capacity crunches, OCI Preemptible Instances always bill at a flat, predictable 50% discount off the already-low OCI On-Demand rate, making them ideal for CI/CD, Kubernetes batch pools, and data pipelines.
- **Evaluator Score (0 to 10 Points)**: `[   / 10 ]`

### Vendor Question 2: How do Oracle Support Rewards work when we move workloads to OCI?
- **Bidder Response Requirement**: Provide a concrete architectural explanation, reference toolset, and verifiable production proof. Generic marketing statements will be scored zero.
- **Evaluation Benchmark (What High-Scoring Responses Must Demonstrate)**: For every $1 of OCI Universal Credits consumed, customers with on-premises Oracle technology licenses earn $0.25 (or $0.33 for ULA customers) in rewards that directly pay down their annual Oracle technical support renewal invoice.
- **Evaluator Score (0 to 10 Points)**: `[   / 10 ]`

### Vendor Question 3: What is included in the downloadable PDF Solution Brief?
- **Bidder Response Requirement**: Provide a concrete architectural explanation, reference toolset, and verifiable production proof. Generic marketing statements will be scored zero.
- **Evaluation Benchmark (What High-Scoring Responses Must Demonstrate)**: The 6-page PDF Solution Brief contains the complete 2026 4-Cloud Price Benchmark Tables (Compute, Spot/Preemptible, GPU, Block Storage IOPS, Object Storage, Egress, Kubernetes, and Managed DBs), plus our 10-step OCI FinOps Right-Sizing Playbook.
- **Evaluator Score (0 to 10 Points)**: `[   / 10 ]`

### Vendor Question 4: How do you prevent report and query fan-out bloat, and how do you guarantee zero vendor lock-in?
- **Bidder Response Requirement**: Detail your methodology for clustering redundant legacy queries/reports into canonical core SQL views with runtime or AI-inference filtering, and specify customer code/data ownership upon project completion.
- **Evaluation Benchmark (What High-Scoring Responses Must Demonstrate)**: Bidder must demonstrate deterministic AST SQL clustering (collapsing 75%-90% of cloned reports into core database views with runtime predicates), 100% customer ownership of all DDL, PL/SQL, application source code, and Terraform scripts, and zero proprietary runtime lock-in.
- **Evaluator Score (0 to 10 Points)**: `[   / 10 ]`

### Vendor Question 5: Describe your automated regression testing, parallel run, and zero-downtime cutover methodology.
- **Bidder Response Requirement**: Specify how data parity, business-rule equivalence, and rollback safety are verified prior to production cutover.
- **Evaluation Benchmark (What High-Scoring Responses Must Demonstrate)**: Bidder must provide automated row-count and cryptographic hash reconciliation, automated unit/UI test suites (e.g., utPLSQL, Playwright), and a rehearsed cutover runbook with sub-minute rollback capability.
- **Evaluator Score (0 to 10 Points)**: `[   / 10 ]`

---

## SECTION 5: COMMERCIAL PRICING & LICENSING MATRIX (MODIFIABLE)

Bidders must complete the fixed-price milestone table below and disclose all recurring software or cloud consumption assumptions.

| Milestone / Cost Category | Deliverable & Acceptance Gate | Fixed Fee / Annual Cost (USD) | Estimated Duration (Weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Phase 0: Discovery & AST Code/Schema X-Ray** | Verified inventory, dead-code manifest, core SQL fan-out map, and final blueprint | `$[Insert]` | `[2 - 3 Weeks]` |
| **Phase 1: Target Environment & Automated Uplift** | Provisioned target stack, schema migration, and core business logic conversion | `$[Insert]` | `[4 - 8 Weeks]` |
| **Phase 2: UI, Integrations, Reporting & UAT** | Completed application/portal screens, runtime reports, AOP templates, and UAT sign-off | `$[Insert]` | `[3 - 6 Weeks]` |
| **Phase 3: Production Cutover & Hypercare** | Rehearsed cutover, reconciliation sign-off, documentation, and 30-day hypercare | `$[Insert]` | `[2 - 3 Weeks]` |
| **Optional: Annual Managed Services / Support** | 24x7 monitoring, patching, DBA performance tuning, and quarterly enhancements | `$[Insert / yr]` | `[12 Months]` |

---

## SECTION 6: PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORECARD (MODIFIABLE)

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| **1. Technical Architecture & Automation Tooling** | `35%` | Depth of AST automation, query fan-out rationalization, database/cloud architecture, and zero lock-in. |
| **2. Verifiable Production Experience & References** | `25%` | Proven track record delivering identical `OCI vs. AWS vs. Azure vs. GCP Pricing & Spot VMs` engagements with measurable outcomes. |
| **3. Cutover Safety, Testing & Compliance** | `20%` | Rigor of data reconciliation, automated regression testing, security/compliance controls, and rollback safety. |
| **4. Commercial Value & Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)** | `20%` | Transparent fixed-fee milestone pricing and 3-to-5 year software/cloud licensing savings. |
| **TOTAL** | **`100%`** | |

---
*Template Reference: `VNA-RFP-018` | Companion Portal: https://oci-vs-aws-azure-gcp-cost.web.app/ | This site is designed by Viscosity.AI*